In contrast, the same period has seen an escalation of claims made about the instrumentality of museums to source communities and stakeholder groups as well as governments. Ideas of shared authority, empowerment through recognition, community collaboration, and political agency have transformed the field of museum studies. In this chapter, I draw on theorizing from the field of museum studies and on several case studies that explore the relationship between collective action and the Smithsonian Institution to highlight and address the lacunae evident in social movement theory, and propose analytical alternatives.
In so doing, I revisit Clifford's argument that museums can function as contact zones. Message, K and Witcomb, A. This chapter presents a theoretical framework and justification for the volume's broader aim of devising and showcasing critical perspectives on the museum as an institution and on museums as a series of individual specificities and This chapter presents a theoretical framework and justification for the volume's broader aim of devising and showcasing critical perspectives on the museum as an institution and on museums as a series of individual specificities and contingencies from a range of disciplinary and intellectual traditions.
Our starting point is Nicholas Thomas's argument that museums can be understood as a method which is itself generative of theory rather than simply as a site on which to perform theoretical models of analysis.
We build on this approach by analyzing the ways in which contributors to this volume have generated new forms of knowledge using museums to think with. Among these approaches are the moves beyond governmentality paradigms toward an understanding of the nondiscursive, affective functions of museums; and a recognition of the role of museums in the production of reflexive forms of knowledge and citizenship formation, as well their activist role in society. We argue, in the final instance, that the field of museums provides an expanded field of vision for those of us interested in following particular theoretical debates, but that it does so precisely because this field is constituted through a series of methodological practices that have and continue to be key to the ways in which disciplines are shaped, public space is understood and produced, subjectivities are shaped, and relations between peoples are enabled.
If there was ever any doubt as to the contributions of museums to the formation of culture or their relevance to innovation in both theory and disciplinary practices, we hope our collection goes a long way to demonstrating the value of thinking otherwise. Message, K , 'Returning to Racism : new challenges for museums and citizenship', in Laurence Gourievidis ed. Message, K , Review of William S.
View on journals. Message, K , 'Slipping through the cracks: museums and social inclusion in Australian cultural policy development ', International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books, pp. Message, K , 'Exceeding the limits of representation? Petitioning for constitutional change at the Museum of Australian Democracy', in R. Sandell and E. Nightingale ed. Message, K , 'Contemporary cause-based collecting, controversy and curatorial activism: At the National Museum of American History from the s', in Johan Hegardt ed.
Message, K , 'Museums in the twenty-first century: Still looking for signs of difference', Konsthistorisk tidskrift - Journal of Art History, vol.
Message, K , 'New directions for civil renewal in Britain: Social capital and culture for all? Message, K , 'Culture, citizenship and Australian multiculturalism: the contest over identity formation at the National Museum of Australia', Humanities Research, vol.
XV, no. Message, K , 'Museum studies: borderwork, genealogy, revolution', Museum and Society, vol. Message, K , 'Meeting the challenges of the future? Museums and the public good', reCollections, vol.
Message, K , 'Contested sites of identity and the cult of the new: The Centre Cultural Tjibaou and the constitution of culture in New Caledonia', reCollections, vol. Message, K , 'Are we there yet?
View on borderlands. Edited volumes journals.
Museum Worlds: Advances in Research is a multi-disciplinary, refereed, annual journal from Berghahn Journals that will publish work that significantly advances knowledge of global trends, case studies and theory relevant to museum Museum Worlds: Advances in Research is a multi-disciplinary, refereed, annual journal from Berghahn Journals that will publish work that significantly advances knowledge of global trends, case studies and theory relevant to museum practice and scholarship around the world.
Responding to the need for a rigorous, in-depth review of current work in the broad field of Museum Studies, Museum Worlds: Advances in Research will contribute to the ongoing formation of Museum Studies, as an academic and practical field of research which is rapidly expanding and alive with potential, opportunity and challenge that parallels the rapid growth of museums in just about every part of the world.
Museum Worlds: Advances in Research aims to trace and comment on major regional, theoretical, methodological and topical themes and debates, and encourage comparison of museum theories, practices, and developments in different global settings. Each issue includes a conversation piece on a current topic, as well as peer reviewed scholarly articles and review articles, book and exhibition reviews, and news on developments in museum studies and related curricula in different parts of the world.
Drawing on the expertise and networks of a global Editorial Board of senior scholars and museum practitioners, the journal will both challenge and develop the core concepts that link different disciplinary perspectives on museums by bringing new voices into ongoing debates and discussions. Articles will be of exceptional quality and general interest from around the world.
Museum Worlds: Advances in Research, vol. Media and Materiality, Special Issue more. View on tandfonline. Compelling cultures: representing cultural diversity and cohesion in multicultural Australia, Special Issue more. View on epress. The central aim of this edition of New Zealand Sociology is to critically engage with this multifaceted terrain by focusing on developments in the Antipodes. Anyone who was interested was granted entry to his teachings.
Reidel made available in print a number of books on the subject purporting transparency in their account of the alchemical process 4. So popular and wide-spread was his influence in Australia that on his death his college was transferred to Australia and renamed the Spagyric College 5. The fine arts in Australia were not, however, directly influenced by the alchemical teachings of the Spagyric College whose following was mostly academic and literary. Instead, the visual artists drew on a variety of different sources in popular culture, such as paperback publications on Surrealist art and Jungian psychology and, above all, the Thames and Hudson series Art and Imagination.
Another significant influence in the s and s was that of the Adyar bookshop-chain which made available to the public an exhaustive esoteric literature in the state capitals of Australia. This bookshop chain was the property of the Theosophical Society. The ideas and symbols of alchemy entered the radical leftist political discourse of younger Australians.
Politicised artists and art-theorists from the s were re-examining the history of European settlement in Australia from the early 19th century and the cultural struggle to establish a new national identity. Artists such as Tom Roberts and Frederick McCubbin had promoted the evolution of a national myth of the white Australian settlement and had sought to establish a patriotic Australian iconography incorporating the dry and arid local landscape of scrubby woodland, semi-desert, eucalyptus trees and farmlands.
Moving from the personal to the political, from the past of imperial conquests to the present of multicultural debates on national identity and history, this paper will also advocate, more generally, the importance of exploring what it means to belong according to an historical lens that is also transnational and relational. Maria Elena Indelicato received her Ph. My thoughts on this paper were partly prompted by the Christchurch massacre, but it is not what this paper will be about.
Since this is an EASA conference, I will pay some limited attention to the relationship between Australian whiteness and similar discourses in Europe.
He has researched Australian Studies in various shapes and forms since the s, interrupted by other research interests in Cultural Studies, Postcolonial Studies and beyond. He has written and co-edited a number of books and written even more articles. Despite the long theoretical and empirical history of decolonising nations, calls to decolonize a wide range of institutions and practices have become increasingly prominent in recent years, particularly since the Rhodes Must Fall and Why is My Curriculum White? Everything from schools and universities through to methodologies and academic disciplines have been subject to such calls.
One element that most campaigns have in common, though, is a concern to effect substantive rather than superficial institutional or practical change. This plays out in educational, health and political institutions, but also increasingly in cultural institutions like museums and galleries. Activists, scholars and practitioners are increasingly asking: how does one effect long-term, systemic institutional change amidst the lingering, structural impacts of colonialism, and the relative absence of public debate on such legacies?
Is such decolonisation internal or external to such institutions? And is it possible to decolonize institutions in the absence of broader political-economic change? Using examples from Australia and the UK, this paper will analyse decolonisation discourse within both contexts, and consider what a genuinely decolonised institution might look like.
And it will ask: what is the relationship between such institutional change and broader patterns of self-determination, sovereignty, reparation and reconciliation? Peter is currently co-editing a. Agricultural fictions have played an intrinsic role in interrogating human relationships with the landscape, in settler societies especially, often perpetuating and creating moral ideals of nationhood, frontier and modernity. Radical changes in technologies, both mechanical and chemical, particularly in the last century, have also modified the landscape in a way that is not so different to geoengineering practices now being flagged as a possible response to climate change.
Specific attention will be applied to the possibilities of the Post-Natural environments imagined in each work, and how they conceptualise settler and Indigenous futures within them. In conclusion, the paper will try to forward a series of strategies for writing about geological catastrophe that does not rely on tropes of science fiction or apocalyptic framings. His fiction has been featured in Meanjin and Ibis House forthcoming.
His critical work has appeared in Cinder. Though published in , the book describes the events that date back a generation. Preventing its fulfilment stood the indigenous population of the continent unwilling to give up their living space, their culture, their economic and social system. Yet it is otherness that has something to say to us. Methodologically, considering that the variety of subject positions within the plurination is determined by a complex interplay of numerous social identities, I propose to employ a form of narratology that can be termed intersectional.
Such an approach highlights that the manner in which literary characters approach the world is necessarily linked to the ways in which they are located with regard to a variety of different identity categories. By extending the concept of perspective structure to take into account character constellation in more general terms and issues on the discourse -level, in particular focalisation, too, it, then, becomes possible to explore how dominance and marginality operate in the construction of the plurination in multiperspectival fiction.
My research interest is in the field of Australian literature. In my PhD project, I focus on contemporary Australian multiperspectival novels and analyse how they reflect the diversification of present-day Australia through their form. In many of his novels, Kim Scott does not depict only various aspects of Aboriginal cultural identity, but also a connection of the Aboriginal Noongar identity with the Australian West.
His research includes American postmodern and contemporary fiction, Australian postmodern fiction, and critical reception of American, British and Australian literature in Slovakia.